Skip to content
Subscribe

Election Update: Presidential Candidates React to Immigration Ruling

Election Update: Presidential Candidates React to Immigration Ruling
Published:

In recent weeks, the issue of immigration has dominated the political arena, most recently due to the Supreme Court's ruling on an Arizona law aimed at enforcing the state's immigration policy. As the general election approaches, here is an update of where the candidates stand on the Supreme Court ruling, and on the issue of immigration:

President Obama made clear his views on immigration, asserting his right as president to halt deportation of young immigrants. He later elaborated at NALEO, clarifying that the group he is targeting is “not people looking for a handout, but climbers and entrepreneurs, the hardest-working people on earth.”

Furthermore, the Supreme Court's decisions to strike down three of four key provisions of Arizona's immigration law, known as SB 1070, today, affirmed that the national government has significant power to regulate immigration.

In regards to today's ruling, the president said he is "pleased" with the outcome, but expressed concern with the practical impact of the remaining provisions in the law.

And while the recent immigration decision may come as a victory to the president, Supreme Court Justice Scalia voiced his strong opinion in his 22-page dissent, directly attacking Obama's recent immigration decision and accusing him of deliberately refusing to enforce immigration statutes.

"The president said at a news conference that the new program is 'the right thing to do' in light of Congress' failure to pass the administration's proposed revision of the Immigration Act. Perhaps it is, though Arizona may not think so. But to say, as the court does, that Arizona contradicts federal law by enforcing applications of the Immigration Act that the president declines to enforce boggles the mind."

Presidential candidate and two-term Governor of New Mexico also offered his opinion on the Supreme Court's immigration decision via Twitter:

#SCOTUS#immigration#Congress#WhiteHouse#tlotJune 25, 2012

After receiving the official nomination for President of the United States at the 2012 Libertarian National Convention, Gary Johnson has been gaining more attention in the news, and as one reporter puts it, could "boldly go where no Libertarian has gone before." On the issue of immigration, he has a specific plan, which can be viewed here.

Following suit, Jill Stein also took advantage of the social platform of Twitter to share her opinion on the Supreme Court's ruling:

#SCOTUS#SB1070gpus#ows#p2#OccupyJune 25, 2012

Presumed Republican Presidential candidate Mitt Romney did not hesitate in responding either, issuing a brief statement in favor of more aggressive efforts by states to enforce immigration laws. And of course, the presidential candidate made sure to include his own attack of the president.

"President Obama has failed to provide any leadership on immigration. This represents yet another broken promise by this President.” He continued, “As candidate Obama, he promised to present an immigration plan during his first year in office,” Mr. Romney said in his statement. “But 4 years later, we are still waiting.”

Romney was vague in his statement and did not reveal whether or not he was in favor of the Arizona law. Despite pressure to elaborate on his position, Romney will likely remain relatively quiet, because support for the Arizona provisions may hurt his chances at winning the Latino vote come November. That battle, however, is looking more and more challenging with the release of a recent poll, placing Obama at a clear advantage among Hispanic voters. The USA Today-Gallup poll shows Obama leading Romney 66 percent to 25 percent. These numbers come after Obama's decisions to halt deportation on young immigrants.

Because of the importance of this demographic of voters, the presidential candidates will likely increase focus on voter registration and get out the vote efforts in the Latino community.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.
Preparing the article

Election Update: Presidential Candidates React to Immigration Ruling

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us