Skip to content
Sign up free
News

FEC Nominees Highlight Agency's Dysfunction

FEC Nominees Highlight Agency's Dysfunction

By Raul Carranza

2-minute read

Credit: 401(K) 2012 via Flickr

Credit: 401(K) 2012 via Flickr

President Obama recently announced his two nominees for the Federal Election Commission (FEC) -- Ann Ravel and Lee E. Goodman.

Ravel, a Democrat, is the chair of the California Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC). She has most notably spearheaded an investigation into an Arizona nonprofit group that spent 11 million dollars opposing Prop 30. She's also received criticism for attempting to regulate political blogs and websites in California.

Goodman, a Republican, is well versed in campaign law. He represented George W. Bush and Dick Cheney in the 2000 presidential election. He's currently employed at LeClairRyan, a firm that specializes in corporate law. He unsuccessfully argued against a ban on direct contributions from corporations to politicians and has publicly supported Citizens United.

It's no accident that President Obama nominated members of both parties. By law, the FEC can't have more than three commissioners from any one party.

Furthermore, the commission must have at least four votes to take any action.

These regulations have lead to widespread criticism from reform advocates. Organizations such as Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) claim that the appointment process is broken and, even though nominees must chosen by the president, they're hand picked by party leaders.

“In reality, an informal understanding between the president and the Congress exists whereby the nominees are selected by party leaders. This tacit understanding only enhances the partisan nature of the process, with party leaders nominating commissioners who further their political interests, some of whom are openly hostile toward the very laws they’re charged with enforcing.”

Other groups, such as Common Cause, say the fundamental model of the FEC needs fixing; they propose a nonpartisan solution.

“Congress should model the FEC after more effective law enforcement agencies that are headed by a single administrator who is appointed for a fixed term by the President and confirmed by the Senate......the one federal law enforcement agency that is primarily responsible for overseeing the campaign activities of Members of Congress needs to be better insulated from those it regulates.”

They continue by citing the fact that during the 2008 elections, the country lacked a functioning FEC due to nominations being stuck in the Senate.

Perhaps the most egregious example of the FEC's ineffectiveness comes in a letter sent to President Obama from 8 different groups:

BNA Report

Despite the evidence, the vote to take action failed 3-3.

Currently, five commissioners are serving on expired terms -- the sixth retired. Confirmation hearings have not yet been scheduled.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

FEC Nominees Highlight Agency's Dysfunction

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us