Skip to content
Sign up free
News

Health and Human Services report highlights FDA neglect of food safety

Health and Human Services report highlights FDA neglect of food safety

By Chris Hinyub

2-minute read

In spite of an increase in the number of commercial food processors and a rise in foodborne illness outbreaks – one of the largest a result of Central Valley spinach producers – the number of food facilities the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has inspected has declined significantly over the last decade. The number of violations identified by inspectors has also fallen.



All of this according to a report issued this week by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services inspector general’s office. What is more troubling, the report states that “when violations were identified, FDA did not routinely take swift and effective action to ensure that these violations were remedied.”



Upon inspecting a food manufacturing facility, the FDA classifies each facility in one of three ways: official action indicated (OAI), voluntary action indicated (VAI), or no action indicated (NAI). The agency can change the initial classification under certain circumstances. Instances which require an OAI grading are subject to enforcement action through legal proceedings if the problem isn't corrected voluntarily.



Here are some highlights directly from the report:



On average, FDA inspects less than a quarter of food facilities each year, and the number of facilities inspected has declined over time.



Fifty-six percent of food facilities have gone 5 or more years without an FDA inspection.



The number of facilities that received OAI classifications has declined over time.



FDA took regulatory action against 46 percent of the facilities with initial OAI classifications; for the remainder, FDA either lowered the classification or took no regulatory action.



For 36 percent of the facilities with OAI classifications in FY 2007, FDA took no additional steps to ensure that the violations were corrected.



Based on these findings, the report recommends increased frequency of food facility inspections, bestowing statutory authority upon the FDA to impose civil penalties on those who do not voluntarily comply with regulations, and granting the FDA the legal authority to access all facility records during the inspection process.



“Taken together, the findings demonstrate that more needs to be done to protect public health and to ensure that FDA has the necessary tools to prevent outbreaks of foodborne illness” the report says.



The FDA has reported to the Inspector General's Office that it does support the proposed legislative changes. But, granting more authority to a federal agency that routinely fails to use its existing power to protect the health and welfare of Californians is a topic for further discussion.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Health and Human Services report highlights FDA neglect of food safety

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us