Skip to content
Sign up free
News

If Internet Is a Public Utility, Petition Signature Laws Need Reform

By Michael Higham

2-minute read

If Internet Is a Public Utility, Petition Signature Law Needs Change

Credit: PeterPhoto123 / Shutterstock.com

California is one of the most tech savvy states and it's reflected in public sentiment. We can sign leases and contacts, check our bank accounts, apply for jobs, and access information online. However, state law does not permit online signature gathering for voter petitions.

A survey from the Public Policy Institute of California, released on June 26, reveals that most Californians (66 percent) say broadband Internet is a public utility rather than a luxury. Majorities across political affiliations support this notion (74 percent of Democrats, 62 percent of independents, 52 percent of Republicans).

Additionally, 67 percent of respondents say Internet providers should fund a government program to expand public access. The PPIC asked the following and broke down responses by political affiliations:

“What if there was a government program funded by telecommunications providers that sought to increase access to high-speed broadband Internet for lower-income and rural residents through subsidies? Would you favor or oppose this program?” Credit: PPIC
If Internet Is a Public Utility, Petition Signature Law Needs Change too

The support of increased public Internet access may serve as a sign for change on rules regarding online signature gathering for voter petitions. The California Elections Code, Section 100 states:

Each signer shall at the time of signing the petition or paper personally affix his or her signature...

Attorney Inder Comar explains that a 2011 decision by an appellate court in San Francisco, Ni v. Slocum, says current election code does not permit online signature gathering and it is a decision to be made by the state Legislature:

"Evaluating the policy issues arising from the use of the Internet for petition endorsement and accommodating this technology within the existing signature validation process is outside the proper scope of our task. Because there is no evidence the Legislature has ever considered these questions, let alone affirmatively approved the use of electronic signatures in connection with initiative petitions, we should hesitate to mandate their acceptance by judicial fiat."

While this decision only applies to the San Francisco area, Comar says it's likely other state courts will cite it as precedent.

The outdated law on voter petition signature gathering will need an update sooner rather than later. If California lawmakers were to develop a state-sponsored program to increase public Internet access, changes to the election code regarding online signature gathering will need to be considered.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

If Internet Is a Public Utility, Petition Signature Laws Need Reform

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us