Skip to content
Sign up free
News

Immigration Reform Has Largely Become an Electoral Issue for Lawmakers

Immigration Reform Has Largely Become an Electoral Issue for Lawmakers

By Javier Gonzalez

2-minute read

immigration reform news

Ryan Rodrick Beiler / Shutterstock.com

Optimism in Washington, D.C. over the prospects of passing immigration reform remains high. Last week, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-N.V.) announced debate on Senate Bill 744 will begin on June 10. With surprisingly little clamor from either side of Congress, immigration reform advocates believe that partisan bickering could be overcome in passing immigration reform this year.

Many Republicans have long opposed any comprehensive immigration reform, calling it "amnesty" and arguing publicly that it rewards what they describe as criminal behavior. However, Democrats are emboldened that Republicans must deal with immigration reform before it is too late.

No recent Republican presidential candidate has gotten a majority of Latino votes. In fact, the highest any Republican presidential candidate has gotten recently was George W. Bush's 40 percent in 2004.

With registered Latino voters now 11 million strong and 50,000 Latino citizens turning 18 monthly, Republicans are currently at a serious disadvantage as the Latino voting bloc continues to lean toward the Democratic Party. President Obama's 71 percent among Latinos in 2012 came close to topping Bill Clinton's 72 percent in 1996.

Democrats in Washington are betting Republicans must act before the 2014 midterm elections or face another overwhelming rejection by Latino voters. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) recently told CNN he believes immigration reform will pass by July 4 and eventually the “Republican Party will be consigned to a minority party for a generation.”

Chris Newman, Attorney for the National Day Laborer Organizing Network (NDLON) and lead attorney in several high profile law suits against federal immigration policies, believes the cause of immigration reform has become an electoral issues because immigrant activism put it there.

He argues:

“Immigration reform has been on the national agenda since 2001, but it has risen to the top of the national conversation because immigrants have made a case that the status quo immigration laws are immoral.”

Newman and others are optimistic of this new opportunity, but urge caution that any reforms passed must address the issues that mobilized advocates in the first place. According to Newman and immigration reform activists like him, “suspension of deportation is a necessary first step.”

Instead, some Republicans have focused on border enforcement and expanding access to immigrant workers in agriculture and hi tech industries through temporary visas -- not necessarily a pathway to citizenship. It is far from how Newman and others see reform.

As words from each side come together, the specifics may soon spread far apart. With immigration reform now the most prominent national issue for Congress, how each party defines “reform” appears to be the biggest battle.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Immigration Reform Has Largely Become an Electoral Issue for Lawmakers

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us