Skip to content
Subscribe

Innovative Approach to Free and Equal Elections Proposed for Oregon Ballot

Published:

The Oregon secretary of state has verified the initial sponsorship signatures for a proposed ballot measure that would guarantee all voters and candidates have the right to participate in the state’s publicly-funded primary elections.

In the past, primary reform in Oregon has hit multiple roadblocks – particularly pushback from the two major parties. However, Oregon Open Primaries has introduced a unique initiative that would force the state to adopt a more equitable primary process.

Oregon is one of only 9 states that has a purely closed partisan primary system. This means the state’s taxpayer-funded primary elections bar voters and candidates not affiliated with the Republican and Democratic Parties.

Closed partisan primaries ensure that the parties choose for voters who will be on the November ballot, rather than letting all voters decide. Oregon’s primaries currently deny access to over 1 million voters (or approximately 40% of the state's electorate).

Oregon Open Primaries asserts that Oregonians at-large, including party members, agree that closed primaries have stopped working for voters, and looking at the electoral landscape, it will only disenfranchise more and more voters each election cycle.

“Non-Affiliated voters are the future trend of the electorate,” says Oregon Open Primaries’ Michael DeWolf.

“They are on pace to become the state’s largest group of voters. They have a median age that is 15 years younger than their major party counterparts, and they are a growing force in all parts of the state - urban and rural, liberal and conservative, west and east of the Cascades.”

Reform hasn’t come easy. Ballot initiatives were proposed to open the primaries in 2008 and 2014. Both failed over content disagreements and party resistance.

Oregon Open Primaries’ latest proposal takes a different approach. It does not call on a specific reform to the way primaries are conducted. It instead adds language to the Oregon Constitution to enshrine the rights to participate in primaries to all voters and candidates, regardless of party affiliation or lack thereof.

It is not a reform tactic that is commonly used. However, the group believes it is the best avenue for success.

“This citizen initiative is readily understood by all voters -- its focus on equitable access to the ballot is showing broad appeal among voters of all ages, all political persuasions, and all parts of the state,” says DeWolf.

“It sidesteps specific process reforms that may confuse voters and derail the initiative’s approval.”

Adding a “free and equal elections” section to the Oregon Constitution would force the legislature to act and reform the way primaries are conducted, because the constitution is the ultimate legal authority in the state.

“Once the initiative passes, we will be working with the reform community to propose specific statutory reforms for the legislature to consider. Every model should be on the table. Let’s have a robust discussion AFTER the state is forced to act. ” says DeWolf.

Open primaries advocates also understand the risks. The legislature may not act in good faith with the amendment, but there are options available to voters if this happens, including a second citizen initiative or a lawsuit to apply even more pressure on the legislature.

Oregon Open Primaries has to collect over 150,000 signatures to certify their measure for the November ballot. It is a grand feat for a small grassroots organization to accomplish. However, the group is optimistic.

For now, the measure is headed to the Oregon Department of Justice to be given a ballot title. The department has until March 22 to draft the title.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Innovative Approach to Free and Equal Elections Proposed for Oregon Ballot

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us