Skip to content
Sign up free
News

Little outrage accompanies release of 'Wall Street Pentagon Papers'

Little outrage accompanies release of 'Wall Street Pentagon Papers'

By Chris Hinyub

2-minute read

It took a lot of wheeling and dealing to get to this moment, but history was made this month when Americans were honored with a "one time look" into the books of the Federal Reserve. You probably didn't hear about it with the Wikileaks cables taking precedent in news cycles. What was gleaned from this pseudo-audit was nothing short of frightening. Some commentators call the findings criminal, but the magnitude of the situation requires some other descripton, one that probably doesn't exist.

Californians, pay attention. I'm going to show you where your tax money goes. As the largest donor state to the national treasury, it would behoove you to know where the federal government spends the money it collects from you. Earlier this month, the Federal Reserve released details of its lending programs which started during the credit crisis of 2008. It is now known that the central bank of the United States implemented a secret, taxpayer-funded bailout of favored foreign central banks to the tune of $12.3 trillion, with a 'T'. These friends of the Fed now hold inordinate leverage against their respective regional economies, all thanks to you! Not only was Congress not consulted in this matter, they were completely oblivious to it.

Secrecy has been the name of the game since the inception of the Federal Reserve System in 1910. It was then that a small clique of private bankers met covertly on Jekyll Island off the coast of Georgia. These men would write the legislation which gave them central bank status and the sole authority to issue the currency of the United States. Their efforts coalesced in 1913 to sell the public on the Federal Reserve Act. The "creature from Jekyll Island," to borrow a phrase coined by outspoken Fed critic G. Edward Griffin, was instituted to regulate the banking system, manage monetary policy, and maintain stability of the financial system by preventing bank runs. They were given all of these god-like powers with extremely limited government oversight.

"The importance of the Federal Reserve and its public-private nature have provoked many a conspiracy theory, which is not helped by its Inspector General Elizabeth Coleman’s admission in May 2009, that the FDS could not account for $9 TRILLION in 'off-balance sheet transactions,'” writes one blogger.

Continuing, "Coleman’s admission provoked outrage among the American people, who demanded Congress to audit the Federal Reserve. The Fed, in turn, resisted every effort. Its chairman, Ben Bernanke, at one time even used fear tactics, darkly warning that an audit by the General Accounting Office 'would be highly destructive to the stability of the financial system, the dollar and our national economic situation.'"

Is Bernanke correct?  Would an audit of the Federal Reserve System destabilize our financial system because of some inherent flaw with openness and transparency, or will the truth incite public demand for the destabilization of the Fed?

This is the “leak” which should have been plastered across cable tv news tickers and headlined throughout the nation. How did Wall Street's Pentagon Papers, as David DeGraw refers to them, go relatively unnoticed and uncriticized?

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Little outrage accompanies release of 'Wall Street Pentagon Papers'

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us