Skip to content
Sign up free
News

Local Control of School Funding Can Result in Program Cuts

Local Control of School Funding Can Result in Program Cuts

By Michael Abrams

2-minute read

Credit: http://images.onset.freedom.com/

Local Control of School Funding Can Result in Program Cuts

Often overlooked in the debate about California's new school funding plan is the discussion of local spending control. The state provides funding for specific K-12 programs, known as categorical grants. With the similar, but competing, proposals from Gov. Jerry Brown and the state Senate, categorical grants are to be eliminated.

Categorical grants can range from providing safety and mentoring to physical education and performing arts. The new funding proposals give local school districts the option to continue funding these programs. Districts will be able to spend their money as they see fit, and certain programs may not be in the picture. An example of the proposed funding formula (click to enlarge)

Local Control of School Funding Can Result in Program Cuts

To replace categorical grants, new school funding plans create a formula to allocate higher portions to districts with a higher population of English learning and low-income students.

California would operate on the principle that local districts know what's best for its students. The governor also states, "there is broad consensus that the current system of school finance is inequitable."

The current budget proposal argues that disadvantaged students will experience a better allocation of resources:

"Even before the substantial reductions to revenue limits and categorical programs that began in 2008-09, the distribution of resources between schools differed substantially. Generally, schools with relatively higher proportions of English learners and student from low-income families had lower revenue limits and relied more heavily on state aid, including categorical funds."

The Sacramento Bee recently illustrated the predicament CalSAFE is in with regards to funding. The California School Age Families Education program aids teenage parents to get through high school or a GED program. While CalSAFE is currently state-mandated, its funding is still under flexible apportionment, and those with CalSAFE have said its already been impacted.

CalSAFE received $46.4 million in 2012-13 from the state. Total categorical funds from the current fiscal year was at $6 billion. Music and arts received $88 million, middle and high school counseling received $167 million, and school libraries received $370 million, all in categorical funds for the year.

The California budget is a hot topic, the state government has until June 15 to pass a plan. California Democrats may face harsh criticism if the deadline is not met since it has a supermajority in the Legislature.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Local Control of School Funding Can Result in Program Cuts

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us