Skip to content
Sign up free
News

Massachusetts Senate Race to Be Decided by Independent Voters

Massachusetts Senate Race to Be Decided by Independent Voters

By Michael Abrams

3-minute read

The Massachusetts Senate race is quickly heating up, with 2-year incumbent Republican Scott Brown (winner of a special election to fill Ted Kennedy’s seat in 2010) neck-and-neck in the polls with presumed Democratic nominee and liberal icon, Elizabeth Warren. The seat, long-held by Democrats, is an important one to the Democratic establishment, and thus wallets on both sides are opening wide, giving this race a chance at being the most expensive ever.

Most significant, however, is Massachusetts’s voter demographics: more than half the state’s voters are registered independents. With Warren a dream-candidate for the States’ liberals, and Brown conservative enough for most establishment Republicans, the race has become a brawl for the independent vote.

Brown’s surprise win in 2010 came on the shoulders of independent voters, and his campaign is attempting to make that happen again. Brown’s TV ads quote Leslie Stahl’s 60 minutes feature on him: “He’s turned out to be fiercely independent, and beholden to no one.” In his own words, at his campaign kickoff in January, Brown said:

"Once again I won’t have the political establishment behind me – not the one on Beacon Hill, and certainly not the one on Capitol Hill. All I will have going for me is my independent record as your United States Senator, and the independent spirit of the Massachusetts voter. I’ll take those advantages any day over the political machine, and with your help in this campaign we will beat the odds again together."

Yet, despite Brown’s self-applied label of independence, he has received the maximum legal backing possible from the National Republican Senatorial Campaign as well as large monetary donations from the PACs associated with some of the top Republican leadership in the Senate (including Mitt Romney, Mitch McConnell, and Jon Kyl). While there is no denying that Brown voted across the aisle more frequently than most other Republican senators, he still voted with Republican partisanship 76% of the time. Moreover, Brown voted with his party 93% of the time before Warren entered the race.

Meanwhile, Warren has been doing her part to appeal to independents as well. For the most part, it has been working. As Public Policy Polling puts it, “Republicans love [Brown], giving him an 80/7 approval spread. But his appeal to Democrats and independents is not what it once was.” Going further, PPP writes “Warren is reclaiming the middle from Brown. We find her up 42-40 with moderate voters, a group that we found Brown leading Coakley 55-41 with.”

Warren, born to lower-middle class parents and now a Harvard professor, is known for her economic expertise and advocacy for accountability on Wall Street. She is the inventor of and special adviser to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Warren is a dream candidate for many liberals looking for more regulation on major banks.

While Warren has not directly labeled herself independent, her rhetoric shows she is appealing to moderate voters: she stands for reforming Washington and advocating for working class families. As she says on her website:

"I’ve seen the thundering herds of lobbyists fill the halls of Congress first-hand, and I can tell you that Washington works for them and the big corporations and banks they represent, but too often it doesn’t work for middle class families. That’s got to change."

The Massachusetts senate race reflects the increasing influence of independent voters in this country.  Unfortunately, it is yet another example of devoted members of either party spinning their diction and tweaking their ads to capture independent votes and get into office. Though independents are gaining traction, they still represent a demographic group that candidates from either party try to use to their advantage to get elected.

Instead, independents should be a diverse and varied core of opinions and ideologies that look to reform a broken Washington. Each independent should be a vote for something different than a typical Republican or a Democrat, not a vote that can go either Republican or Democrat. If either Scott Brown or Elizabeth Warren start to grasp this, their campaign is sure to see a bump in the polls.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Massachusetts Senate Race to Be Decided by Independent Voters

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us