Skip to content
Subscribe

Missouri Lawmakers Are Once Again Targeting the Ballot Initiative Process

Missouri Lawmakers Are Once Again Targeting the Ballot Initiative Process
Published:

The Missouri House approved a proposal Thursday that would make it harder for citizens to amend the state’s constitution via ballot initiative. The resolution would raise the vote threshold to pass constitutional changes from a simple majority to 60%.

This has been a continued effort by state lawmakers. The threat to the ballot initiative process is so serious that in 2022 a two-thirds vote requirement had to be stopped by a filibuster in the state Senate.

The resolution now heads to the Senate where majority leadership has expressed support, suggesting a repeat of 2022 is likely.

Missouri House Speaker Dean Plocher says changes to the state constitution should not come “willy nilly” and pointed to “out of state money and interests that have very little connection to Missouri” as justification for support.

Opponents of the bill, like House Minority Leader Crystal Quade, say the “citizens of Missouri have used the initiative petition process for so many things. And people enjoy that process. They enjoy being a part of the conversation.”

Missouri voters have used the ballot initiative process to pass several issues, including anti-gerrymandering and anti-corruption amendments to the state’s constitution. Raising the threshold would make it harder for reform campaigns to get off the ground.

The difference between a simple majority and a 60 percent threshold is exponential for any campaign. Reaching the number of people it would take to get those votes would mean more money, more people on the ground, and more resources needed from campaigns.

The Missouri legislative proposal could outright deter some future nonpartisan election reform efforts at a time when election reform is not only in high demand, but is also winning one campaign after another each election cycle.

The irony is that if the resolution is approved by the Missouri Senate, it would then go before voters where a simple majority can adopt it.

Similar proposals have gone before voters in other states. In 2022, South Dakota and Arkansas voters overwhelmingly rejected attempts by state lawmakers to make the ballot initiative process more cumbersome for votes and campaigns.

Attacks on the citizen initiative process have grown and expanded exponentially over the past few years. The anti-corruption group RepresentUs released a report in 2022 that found that 11 states have proposed over 60 laws and resolutions since 2017.

Twenty-nine of these legislative proposals were proposed in Missouri alone.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.
Preparing the article

Missouri Lawmakers Are Once Again Targeting the Ballot Initiative Process

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us