Skip to content
Sign up free
News

Rasmussen: Majority of Voters Think SOTU is a Waste of Time

Rasmussen: Majority of Voters Think SOTU is a Waste of Time

By Gabriel Saint Cyr

2-minute read

Though a majority of likely voters say they will be tuning in to President Obama's final State of the Union address on Tuesday night, most doubt the speech will accomplish much at all.

According to the results of a Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey, 69 percent of likely U.S. voters say they are likely to watch or follow news reports about Tuesday's State of the Union, including 43 percent who say they are very likely to do so. By contrast, just 30 percent say they are unlikely to watch or follow the State of the Union, with 13 percent who say they are very unlikely.

The findings vary along party lines. Fifty-seven percent of Democrats say they are very likely to watch or follow the State of the Union, compared with 33 percent of Republicans and 37 percent of independents.

But despite the level of interest, voters are skeptical that the speech is even effective. Only 32 percent of likely voters believe the State of the Union is important in setting the nation's political agenda for the coming year, compared with 60 percent who say the speech is mostly just for show.

On top of that, only 13 percent think that most presidents accomplish what they promise to do at the State of the Union. Seventy-one percent believe they don't.

These results also hinge on party affiliation. Whereas 25 percent of Democrats believe most presidents accomplish what they promise, only 10 percent of Republicans and 5 percent of independents feel the same way.

The State of the Union is typically delivered in late January or early February, but preparations for the annual address can begin as early as the summer of the previous year. Though the Constitution requires the president to periodically inform Congress about the “state of the union,” it does not specify that the address must be delivered in the form of a speech.

The tradition of speaking before a joint session of Congress dates back to George Washington's 1790 address in New York City, the provisional U.S. capital at the time. Thomas Jefferson discontinued the speech format, regarding it as too monarchical, and opted instead to send written addresses to Congress.

State of the Union speeches would not return until 1913 with Woodrow Wilson, who cited the importance of visible presidential leadership in his return to Washington's tradition.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Rasmussen: Majority of Voters Think SOTU is a Waste of Time

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us