Skip to content
Sign up free
News

Southwest Water Wars: 8 Things To Know

Southwest Water Wars: 8 Things To Know

By Bob Morris

2-minute read

Stop scapegoating agriculture. Sure, agriculture in the Southwest uses lots of water. It’s also where much of the nation’s food comes from due to multiple growing seasons a year. If those areas grow less, prices for food will increase. Farmers do try to conserve water. Can they use even less water? Sure, but so can everyone else.

Aging water infrastructures are leaky. California water systems lose an average of 10% of their water to leakage, with some as high as 30%. In an era of ever-increasing water scarcity, this is unacceptable. The water systems need to be repaired and upgraded.

Everyone needs to conserve. If you live in an arid or semi-arid area, the era of lush green lawns and multiple golf courses nearby is coming to an end. The Southwest had a bountiful few decades where the water supply seemed endless. Those days are vanishing. Deal with it.

There is too little water for too many people. This is the core issue. It’s not that the California salmon fishing industry is Satan Incarnate while Central Valley farmers are getting shortchanged (or vice versa, depending on your viewpoint) but that an ever-growing population demands more water than is available. New England doesn’t have water wars. The reason is simple. They have lots of water.

The problems are regional and cannot be completely settled within a state. Sure, battles over Sacramento Delta water are internal to California. But its ever-increasing thirst for Colorado River water isn’t. Regional problems require regional solutions.

Desalination is not a panacea. Gosh, some say, let’s just build dozens of desalination plants. Then we will have lots of water.  Well, desalination plants are quite expensive and require large amounts of electricity. Did I mention that power generation is the second largest user of water in the Southwest?

Renegotiate the Colorado River Compact.  Water allocation from the Colorado is still apportioned based on a 1922 agreement. The population then was tiny in comparison to now. Everyone agrees the Colorado River Compact is a dinosaur but no one wants change for fear of ending up with less water. But events and drought may force change regardless.

Expect and plan for change. There are some indications that the past 150 years in the Southwest were unusually wet.  If so, and it reverts to the norm, then there will be substantially less water available. The Anasazi thrived in the Southwest for hundreds of years and were at their peak when several decade-long droughts destroyed their civilization. Just saying…

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Southwest Water Wars: 8 Things To Know

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us