Skip to content
Subscribe

Super PACs Drive Record Spending in Wisconsin Supreme Court Race

Early voting starts March 18 in Wisconsin’s high-stakes Supreme Court race. Super PACs have fueled record-breaking spending, which is now close to $59 million and has surpassed the previous record set in 2023 for a state Supreme Court election.

Super PACs Drive Record Spending in Wisconsin Supreme Court Race
Photo by Planet Volumes on Unsplash. Unsplash+ license obtained by editor..
Published:

Early voting starts March 18 in Wisconsin’s high-stakes Supreme Court race. Super PACs have fueled record-breaking spending, which is now close to $59 million and has surpassed the previous record set in 2023 for a state Supreme Court election.

The contest between Dane County Circuit Court Judge Susan Crawford and Waukesha County Circuit Court Judge Brad Schimel will determine the ideological balance of the state’s highest court.

Super PAC Influence in the Race

Twenty percent (20%) of the overall spending in this year’s race comes from two Super PACs operated by billionaire Elon Musk, who has emerged as the Schimel campaign's most prominent financial backer.

Musk-affiliated groups — including America PAC and Building America’s Future PAC — have collectively spent over $12 million supporting Schimel’s bid, according to WisPolitics and filings with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission.

America PAC alone has dedicated nearly $6.2 million to canvassing efforts promoting Schimel. Meanwhile, WisPolitics has tallied $6 million in spending by the Building America’s Future PAC between buys tracked by AdImpact and that group’s filings with the state.

Musk may be vested in who wins the race for the Wisconsin Supreme Court. According to reporting by The Badger Project, “a lawsuit by his electric car company Tesla that argues the state is blocking it from selling its cars directly to consumers could appear before the state’s highest court eventually.”

Direct campaign contributions to the candidates are limited to $20,000 per person. But as Judge Schimel explained recently at a town hall, it doesn’t have to stop there:

“I don't know if you know this, but you can give $20,000 as an individual to a statewide candidate. So, I mean, I'll have to have my friend Jeff take the checks. I can't handle the dirty money, but if you've got your $20,000 checks, he'll take care of those for you tonight."

Schimel added:

"Then, if you want to give a lot more, you can give that to either of the state parties. And they can transfer it…they can transfer that to candidates.”

Crawford has benefited to a much smaller degree from Super PACs. The Wisconsin Conservation Voters Independent Expenditure Committee, a Super PAC, has reported approximately $200,000 supporting her campaign.

Crawford is also being supported by contributions directed through the state Democratic Party, which has received donations from big-name donors, including George Soros and Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker.

At a recent debate, Schimel, who is backed by Republicans, called Soros a “dangerous person to have an endorsement from.” Crawford fired back, claiming that Musk “has basically taken over Brad Schimel’s campaign.”

As of early this week, WisPolitics reported that spending in support of Schimel has reached over $33.3 million, compared to $25.5 million backing Crawford. These numbers are expected to grow as Election Day approaches.

How the Candidates Are Spending Their Funds

Crawford had reserved nearly $17.6 million in advertisements leading up to April 1, according to AdImpact. Schimel, by contrast, has spent almost $8.8 million on ad buys so far.

Crawford is currently airing more frequent ads on broadcast television. A WisPolitics check of AdImpact data and a media buying source showed she holds an advantage in gross ratings points, a measure of how often ads are seen on broadcast TV.

National Attention and Historical Context

Two years ago, the campaign between Justice Janet Protasiewicz and former Justice Daniel Kelly drew $56 million in total spending, shattering previous records. Prior to Wisconsin’s recent high-dollar races, the national record for state Supreme Court spending was held by a 2004 Illinois election, which totaled around $15 million (National Institute on Money in Politics).

Election Implications

Beyond the Wisconsin Supreme Court race, voters will also weigh in on a proposed constitutional amendment requiring photo identification at polling places. Supporters argue it would enhance election security, while opponents contend it could lead to voter disenfranchisement

Early voting starts March 18 and continues across Wisconsin until shortly before Election Day on April 1.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Super PACs Drive Record Spending in Wisconsin Supreme Court Race

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us