Skip to content
Sign up free
News

Time to Cut the Budget

Time to Cut the Budget

By Chris Moody

2-minute read

Only days after Californian's agreed to shell out  $40 billion for a high-speed rail program, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger announced a plan to hopefully put an end to the crippling state budget deficit.

In order to overcome the $11.2 billion budget shortfall, the governor proposed a 1.5-cent increase in state sales taxes, a higher taxes on oil and liquor production, and a state workers’ pay cut for 19 months. He has also proposed that the state slash government spending by $4.5 billion.

It is certain that California has a crisis on its hands, but are raising taxes the proper cure?

The good news is that California generates a substantial percentage of revenue from out-of-state tourists, which means that people living beyond the California border will pay a percentage of the sales tax hike.  The better news is that while Schwarzenegger has proposed raising taxes, he also stated the obvious truth that California needs to slow down on spending.

The non-partisan Tax Foundation ranks California as having a higher state and local tax burden than the national average, placing the state income tax as the 6th highest in the country. Moreover, wealthy Californians pay more than rich taxpayers in any other state and all Californians already pay the highest gasoline tax in the nation.

With so much taxation, California still finds itself in a budget mess. For a state that taxes its people so heavily, shouldn't the budget have little trouble balancing itself out?

It’s time California tried something else, besides this tax and spend policy. The government programs that proponents argue we need so desperately need to take a vacation: A Forest Gump “go somewhere and never come back” vacation, to be precise.

Unfortunately, there is a split among California Republicans on how to reverse the  deficit. Both Schwarzenegger and the Lieutenant Governor John Garamendi agree that taxes must be raised. In fact, Garamendi doesn't even think spending should be reduced at all. “The governor is calling for another $4.5 billion in cuts," Garamendi said.  "My answer is no. Enough already.”

On the other hand, the Republican leadership in the Legislature has made it clear that the only way to fix the budget mess is to reduce spending.

"We believe the only responsible way to solve our budget problem is to cut wasteful spending and start living within our means,” said Assembly Republican Leader Mike Villines in a statement. “One thing is clear – higher taxes will do nothing to solve the problem and Republicans will stand united in rejecting any attempt to raise taxes.”

I encourage all who call themselves independents to stand behind the latter Republicans on this issue, and hold them accountable for their words when they go to Sacramento to cast their vote. Besides, over the next four to eight years, the federal government is going to tax you enough, anyhow.

Ladies and gentlemen, get out your scalpels. Or better yet, grab your hatchets. It’s time to cut the budget.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Time to Cut the Budget

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us