Skip to content
Sign up free
News

UC Online Classes in Exchange for $250 Million Funding

UC Online Classes in Exchange for $250 Million Funding

By Xander Pakzad

2-minute read

Credit: sacbee.com

UC online classes in state budget

In a press conference last week, Governor Jerry Brown outlined his four-year plan to balance the state budget. He declared strong determination not to see a single tuition increase at the University of California while he serves in office. To accomplish this, Brown is pressuring the UC Regents to push forward with offering online classes.

The passage of last year’s Proposition 30 has allowed the state to increase UC funding by $250 million, to $2.6 billion. However, Brown warned the increase is contingent upon the University holding up their end of the bargain: allocating funds within the University more efficiently.

"The funding increases are associated with the changes, both maintaining affordability as well as going to a more efficient model, effective model where they’re reducing time-to-degree, where they’re increasing course offerings in a matter that’s assisting students in graduating closer to four years."

The $250 million increase in UC funding falls short of the $788 million needed for new developments and renovations. Among the methods of raising revenue and cutting costs, the Regents have proposed increasing out-of-state enrollment, restructuring financial aid, and utilizing a web-based platform to teach core curriculum.

The motivation behind online classes was not to make education more accessible or academically enriching, but rather to balance the struggling university's budget. Pressured by Brown and his proposed budget for this year, the Board has recently been in talks with Udacity, an online course developer who offered Stanford courses online before becoming an independent institution. The first implementation would move required general education classes from overcrowded lecture halls to the web.

In light of the increased funding, equivalent to an extra $2,492 per student, the decision to move class instruction to the web is as much counterintuitive as it is disheartening. Much of each campus’s appeal lies with renowned faculty and university life. Removing these factors may abase UC’s reputation and deprive students of qualities they have come to expect from the university experience.

Although Brown agrees that the UC system needs an operational and financial restructuring, the digital transition may very well enable the Board's dysfunction to continue. Whether it be tuition increases or a service downgrade in the form of UC online classes, last resorts have become standard operating procedure for the UC Regents. Continuing this pattern prevents them from having to create a sustained, long-term budget.

Both Brown and the Board of Regents have touted Proposition 30 as crucial to both balancing the state budget and keeping higher education affordable. While money raised from Prop 30’s passage allows the state to invest in higher education, it was not guaranteed exactly who would benefit until the recently announced 2013-2014 budget.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

UC Online Classes in Exchange for $250 Million Funding

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us