Skip to content
Sign up free
News

Despite Public and Student Opposition, UC Board of Regents Raise Tuition

Despite Public and Student Opposition, UC Board of Regents Raise Tuition

By Steve Baker

2-minute read

KFBK Poll: Do you think tuition should be increased at UC Campuses

Amid protests, the University of California’s Board of Regents voted 14 to 7 in favor of raising the cost of tuition 5 percent annually over the next 5 years. The vote ended a 3-year freeze. The regents' plan is focused on raising staff quality and bringing up admission levels within the ten-campus system. Despite possible admission boosts, future UC students and families will pay an additional $600-$700 in fees.

The regents consists of 26 members, only one of which, Sadia Saifuddin, is appointed by the student body with "full powers of organization and governance" detailed in section 9 of Article 1X of the state Constitution. A tentative vote of 7-2 on Wednesday alluded to the likelihood of an increase.

The proposed increase of 5 percent annually will raise tuition costs from $12,804 during Fall 2015 to about $15,564 by Fall 2019. Students with family incomes over $175,000 a year would likely be able to afford the price of the increase while students of families with lesser income are expected to rely more on financial aid.

Janet Napolitano and other regents have asserted that without increased annual funding from the state, tuition hikes would be a necessary result -- a proposition Governor Jerry Brown, who is also a regent, opposes.

She explained her position in an op-ed earlier in November:

"The state and the university need to invest in the academic excellence that has made UC into what is widely recognized as the best public university system in the world."

Along with Brown and 6 other dissenting regents, Speaker of the Assembly Toni Atkins opposed the tuition increase. She released a statement calling for an alternative solution:

"I am extremely disappointed the UC Regents voted to raise tuition and impose new burdens on middle class students and their families. There are other steps we can take to get UC the funding it needs. I offered an alternative that would prevent tuition increases, but unfortunately a majority of Regents dismissed them, just as they dismissed the concerns of the students who traveled to the meeting to comment."

Still, students and the public mostly support the opposition from Brown and Saifuddin.

Saifuddin's sentiment has fueled student protests, which became increasing hostile during Wednesday's session. Recent footage of student protesters and placards center on the disparity such a tuition increase would create. A recent poll conducted by Sacramento’s own KFBK detailed a clear separation of opinion as to whether or not an increase should take place.

While today's vote was expected, student activists have been quick to condemn the decision online:

#ucregents Tweets

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Despite Public and Student Opposition, UC Board of Regents Raise Tuition

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us