Skip to content
Subscribe

Unlikely Bedfellows: The Strange Alliance to Expose Epstein Files

President Donald Trump is working hard to put a lid on the Jeffrey Epstein controversy roiling his party. So far, it isn’t working. One procedural tool in Congress, a little-used but powerful discharge petition, could push the issue out of Trump’s control.

Unlikely Bedfellows: The Strange Alliance to Expose Epstein Files
Image generated by IVN staff.
Published:

President Donald Trump is working hard to put a lid on the Jeffrey Epstein controversy roiling his party. So far, it isn’t working. One procedural tool in Congress, a little-used but powerful discharge petition, could push the issue out of Trump’s control.

Trump Truth social post about Epstein.

Last week, Trump’s Justice Department released an unsigned memo concluding that Epstein died by suicide and that no “client list” exists. Since then, Trump has lashed out at those demanding more transparency, a group that includes GOP lawmakers, administration officials, and MAGA influencers, calling them “weaklings” who have been “duped” by a Democratic “hoax.” His message: “There’s nothing else to see here, move along.”

But cracks are showing in his party’s unity. A Quinnipiac University poll released Wednesday found nearly as many Republicans disapprove (36%) as approve (40%) of the administration’s handling of the Epstein case. A CNN poll echoed the discontent, showing 40% of Republicans are “dissatisfied” with government disclosures while just 4% say they are satisfied.

If Congressional Republicans truly want answers, there is one rarely used weapon at their disposal – the discharge petition. It’s rarely used, but maybe a dead man can pull it off.

Massie and Khanna Lead the Charge

Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California are spearheading a discharge petition to compel a vote on releasing all Epstein-related files.

So far, two other Republicans, Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Eric Burlison of Missouri have said they will sign on. Massie also noted that five others support the underlying bill, though they have not yet endorsed the discharge petition itself.

If six Republicans join all 212 House Democrats, they could hit the magic number of 218.

What Is a Discharge Petition and Why Does It Matter?

A discharge petition is a rarely successful but symbolically potent move in the House. If 218 members sign on, a majority of all House seats, rather than just those present, they can force a floor vote even over leadership’s objections.

It is a high bar. Members of the majority party often avoid bucking their leadership, and party leaders have many ways to pressure or punish those who try. Only about 4% of discharge petitions succeed in forcing a vote, according to Sarah Binder, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.

But the Epstein controversy might be different.

A Threat Even If It Fails

Even if the discharge petition falls short, it could still force movement. Binder notes that while only 4% of petitions result in a direct vote, they have triggered votes on similar measures about 8% of the time.

The threat of embarrassment alone, making it look like Trump has lost control of his party, might prompt the administration to release more information or offer a partial compromise.

A Test of Resolve

But the numbers only tell part of the story. Congressional expert Matt Glassman of Georgetown University told CNN that what a discharge petition really requires is not just 218 members, but 218 ‘hellbent’ members.

“Trump seems very involved here, and not too many members want to stick their necks out against him, even if it’s on an issue where the Trump GOP base seems split from the president,” Glassman told CNN.

According to CNN, more Republicans support the underlying bill than the discharge petition. Getting a handful of members on board is one thing; becoming the decisive Republican and the 218th House member to greenlight something Trump doesn’t want is something else entirely.

Why Epstein, Tucker Carlson, and Candace Owens Could Break MAGA Unity

The Epstein case taps into a deep vein of suspicion among Republican voters. Many believe Epstein did not kill himself and suspect a vast conspiracy involving influential figures. That belief could embolden some GOP lawmakers to defy Trump and leadership.

Tucker Carlson is speaking out against the administration for refusing to release more information about Epstein, who had a yearslong friendship with Trump before their falling-out.

“The fact that the U.S. government, the one that I voted for, refused to take my question seriously and instead said, ‘Case closed, shut up conspiracy theorist,’ was too much for me,” Carlson said Friday at the Turning Point USA Student Action Summit, where he devoted his speech to the issue. “And I don’t think the rest of us should be satisfied with that.”

MAGA firebrand Candace Owens accused the president of “gaslighting the public.”

“The Epstein scandal is definitely terminal cancer to Trump’s MAGA movement,” she said in the video, which was first highlighted by Mediaite. “There’s no question about it.”

It seems like you think your base is stupid,” Owens said. “That’s how I feel. I feel like Trump thinks his base is stupid, or, again, because I don’t think he’s pressing send on these messages, the people around him think that Trump is stupid.”

Democrats also have political incentives to back the effort. Pushing the issue could deepen divisions between Trump and his base, a rift they are eager to exploit.

Still, releasing all Epstein files is not without complications. The Justice Department has argued that many documents are under court seal and could implicate individuals who have not been charged with crimes.

The Road Ahead

The fate of the Epstein discharge petition will reveal how seriously Republicans take transparency and how willing they are to challenge Trump.

The recent fight over proxy voting offers a cautionary tale. GOP Rep. Anna Paulina Luna of Florida led a discharge petition to allow parents of newborns to vote by proxy, which appeared to have bipartisan support. But she ultimately cut a deal with House Speaker Mike Johnson for a watered-down version instead of forcing a floor vote.

This time, the stakes are even higher. Challenging Speaker Johnson is one thing. Challenging Trump is a whole different ballgame. For now, the discharge petition hangs in the balance, a procedural test with enormous political implications.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Unlikely Bedfellows: The Strange Alliance to Expose Epstein Files

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us