Skip to content
Sign up free
News

Violence Against Women Act Reauthorization Dies in House Hands

Violence Against Women Act Reauthorization Dies in House Hands

By Terri Harel

2-minute read

The House let the Violence Against Women Act, which supports critical rape and domestic violence counseling programs and other violence prevention strategies, silently expire this week.

Earlier this month, Democratic senators wrote to female Republican House representatives, urging them to push the legislation within their party. The women indicated they were open about the Senate’s broader Violence Against Women Act reauthorization bill, which incorporated provisions extending protections and services to 30 million more women in the LGBT and Native American communities.

Democratic Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) has been an active proponent of the Senate’s provisions and says she plans to reintroduce the legislation in 2013.

Vice President Joe Biden had been working closely with House majority leader Eric Cantor to strike a deal, but House Republicans wouldn’t budge without the removal of the American Indian protections.

The Senate provisions provide critical protections to vulnerable female demographics, and without their passage the bill leaves out a huge number of women from governmental protections against violence. The contested provision regarding American Indians gives tribal authorities power to prosecute perpetrators of violence, even if they are non-Indians.

According to a study by Amnesty International, 86% of Native American women who have been raped or sexually assaulted had non-Indian perpetrators. Tribal lands often have limited access to non-tribal authorities, making it critical for tribes to have full jurisdiction over criminal activities committed on their land and against tribe members.

The House passed a less inclusive version of the bill, H.R. 4970, back in May and the Obama administration openly opposed the move, calling it regressive for women’s rights. The statement of disapproval read:

"The Administration urges the House to find common ground with the bipartisan Senate-passed bill and consider and pass legislation that will protect all victims.  H.R. 4970 rolls back existing law and removes long-standing protections for victims of domestic violence and sexual assault – crimes that predominately affect women.  If the President is presented with H.R. 4970, his senior advisors would recommend that he veto the bill."

After nearly 20 years in action, with plans to extend its benefits, it is baffling that VAWA died in the House. The Senate-proposed reauthorization had passed with strong bipartisan support in April. While each party points fingers as to the fault of the bill’s death, millions of women will be denied life-saving services and counseling. Hopefully the important bill can be reinstated in 2013, but legislators who refused to budge on the provisions should reflect on the opportunity costs of bolstering political careers – it comes at a high price to women’s rights.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Violence Against Women Act Reauthorization Dies in House Hands

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us