Skip to content
Subscribe

Virtual Discussion: The Fight for Equal Independent Voting Rights Makes it to SCOTUS

Every major voting rights movement in U.S. history – whether successful or not – has intertwined with landmark litigation. This was the case for women’s suffrage. It was the case for civil rights. And it is the case in the ongoing effort to protect the right of all voters to have equal participation

Virtual Discussion: The Fight for Equal Independent Voting Rights Makes it to SCOTUS
Photo by Curated Lifestyle on Unsplash. Unsplash+ license obtained by IVN Editor Shawn Griffiths.
Published:

Every major voting rights movement in U.S. history – whether successful or not – has intertwined with landmark litigation. This was the case for women’s suffrage. It was the case for civil rights.

And it is the case in the ongoing effort to protect the right of all voters to have equal participation in taxpayer-funded elections – something millions of independent voters are denied across the U.S.

On October 17, the better election reform groups, Open Primaries and Independent Voter Project (IVP), are co-hosting a virtual discussion titled “Taking the Fight for Open Primaries to Court,” bringing together attorneys that are paving the way for the reform movement.

This includes former Maryland Lt. Governor Boyd Rutherford, IVP attorney Chad Peace, Pennsylvania attorney Matt Fontana, and Open Primaries Senior Vice President Jeremy Gruber in a discussion moderated by Open Primaries President John Opdycke.

The event will also feature Michael J. Polelle, a retired attorney that single-handedly took his lawsuit against the Florida closed primary system that shuts out 3.4 million independent voters to the steps of the Supreme Court.

RSVP HERE

Each of these individuals have been involved in lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of closed primaries in states like New Jersey, where IVP filed suit back in 2014. IVP also challenged California’s use of semi-closed presidential primary elections in 2019.

IVP has already petitioned the Supreme Court to hear both of these cases.

Legal efforts expanded in 2025 to Maryland, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Wyoming, and Florida. IVP and Open Primaries filed a joint amicus brief with the Forward Party in support of the Florida case.

During the virtual discussion, participants will discuss the role these cases have played, are playing, and will continue to play as the legal fight for equal independent voting rights takes new steps to being heard by the nation’s highest court.

Be sure to RSVP for the event, which is scheduled for Friday, October 17, 2025, at 2:30 PM (Eastern) /11:30 AM (Pacific). Register here.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Virtual Discussion: The Fight for Equal Independent Voting Rights Makes it to SCOTUS

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us