Skip to content
Sign up free
News

Voters Beware: Design Flaw Could Compromise Election Results

Voters Beware: Design Flaw Could Compromise Election Results

By Kristen Henderson

2-minute read

San Diego, CALIF. - The November ballot has received criticism for its length and complexity, and now there is concern over the layout of the document itself.

Specifically, the voting bubbles for Measures E and K, both described as “ballot cleanup measures” by several voting rights advocates, are in the exact same positions on reverse sides of the dual-sided paper ballot. That means if a voter fills in a YES vote for Measure E, the voter could unknowingly vote NO for Measure K because of an ink bleed-through.

Measure E, known as the “Bob Filner measure,” simplifies the removal of elected city officials in cases of misconduct. Measure K would remove an existing election provision that allows local races to be decided during the primary stage of the election (rather than the general) if a candidate gets over 50% of the vote. Measure K would require elections to be decided during the November general election, when far more voters are paying attention and participate.

Given Measure E’s overwhelming popularity, it comes as no surprise that Measure K’s proponents are worried about the potential for unintentional bleed-through “No” votes on Measure K. The Measure K coalition, which includes several election law attorneys, reached out to San Diego County Registrar of Voters Michael Vu, requesting that Vu’s office take action to ensure an accurate vote count on Measure K.

Vu admitted that his office made a critical error on the ballot. He agreed to conduct a manual review of all ballots in the event of a miscount, but said no proactive measures will be taken to mitigate the potential for error.

Machines read and count individual votes by scanning for marks in the area. A heavy-handed mark made on the opposite side of the ballot will be registered as intentional and counted – even if it wasn’t the voter’s choice. Voters who cast their ballots with felt tip pens are particularly vulnerable to compromising their votes.

Vu said he is not going to issue a news release to alert the public of the mistake.

UPDATE: IVN has been informed that the registrar has characterized the ballot flaw as an “anomaly” and agreed to consider sending a media release informing votes to reinforce the use of ball point pens to avoid bleed through.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Voters Beware: Design Flaw Could Compromise Election Results

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us