Skip to content
Subscribe

Voters Are Being Denied Real Debates in Top CA Races

Voters Are Being Denied Real Debates in Top CA Races
Published:

SAN DIEGO, CALIF. - The Sacramento Bee reported Thursday that US Sen. Dianne Feinstein and Kevin de León will "debate" each other just weeks before the election. Feinstein agreed to the debate after months of demands from her opponent.

Here's the thing: the debate is scheduled for Wednesday, October 17, at noon PT. It will be hosted by the Public Policy Institute of California and will be streamed online.

Critics of Feinstein say she is intentionally trying to limit the number of people who will tune into the debate, and reject the description that it is a "debate" as the candidates will not actually address each other. It will be more of a side-by-side interview by a moderator.

Bill Carrick, a longtime political consultant for Feinstein, defended the campaign calling it a debate, saying that the format will essentially be the same as the single gubernatorial radio debate hosted by KQED.

The setting of the gubernatorial debate was also unusual, as it was aired on Monday, October 8, at 10 am PT on an NPR radio station in San Francisco. Keep in mind, this is the only debate between two candidates vying to hold the highest political office in the world's fifth largest economy.

Many California voters are being denied the opportunity to see top-ticket candidates debate and lay out their policies in races that will come down to voters outside the political parties.

The US Senate race between Feinstein and de León -- both Democrats -- will be decided by not just Republican voters, but No Party Preference voters, the second-largest voting bloc in California at almost 27% of the registered voting population.

According to a poll published on IVN on October 2, approximately 43 percent of likely voters are undecided in this race. This includes around the same percentage of voters registered outside any political party.

The latest survey from the Public Policy Institute of California shows Feinstein 11 points on top of de León, but that lead was cut in half from July.

Millions of voters in California want to hear more from the candidates to make a decision on who will best represent the state of California, and not just their political party. Yet, few will have an opportunity to see anything outside political ads and media coverage.

It's interesting to note the incumbent's decision to meet de León on the same stage comes on the heels of the Kavanaugh confirmation process, of which she was a central figure. According to the Sacramento Bee, this will be the first "debate" Feinstein has participated in since her re-election bid in 2000.

Stay tuned for further coverage on the California race for US Senate and Wednesday's debate.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Voters Are Being Denied Real Debates in Top CA Races

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us