Skip to content
Sign up free
News

Where's Obama's Environmental Agenda?

Where's Obama's Environmental Agenda?

By Thomas W Ohlson

2-minute read

We are a very polarized nation when it comes to environmental issues. These days, it seems as if Democrats MUST embrace any environmental cause, no matter how small, and that Republicans MUST eschew any environmental issue, regardless of its merits. It is hard to convince people that once upon a time, Republicans and Democrats worked together on environmental issues. In fact, one could argue that Teddy Roosevelt and Richard Nixon did more for the environment than any Democratic Administrations.

The Obama Administration has been a huge disappointment to environmentalists, in that it apparently has no environmental agenda--there simply has been no list of issues or priorities. There have been some initiatives, like the President's Oceans Plan, but no real strategy. Employees at the Department of the Interior say they have never seen an Administration without a specific agenda.

Many environmentalists had looked to the Obama Administration to counter the lax policies of the Bush Administration. Instead, they are left with no federal consistency and thus, have had to turn up their rhetoric to the point that many otherwise reasonable issues have now become unreasonable causes for opponents to lampoon. The real danger of an Administration with no defined strategy is that environmentalists that shout the loudest, stand the best chance of being heard--not because they make the best case, but because of political considerations.

Environmentalists are known for their passion. Faced with a human population explosion, mounting loss of habitat, and a host of climactic and other ecological problems, their passions are certainly warranted. However, where they shoot themselves in the foot is their lack of compromise on the issues. Some prime examples: entire residential communities are threatened with destruction because one subspecies (Puritan Tiger Beetle) of an otherwise prolific beetle species makes its home beneath cliffs, where it needs beach erosion to properly breed; or where a glacial relict snail species (Iowa Pleistocene Snail) that is not found anywhere else in the world except in a precarious microclimate, needs protected status. Are the environmentalists not fighting for some causes that nature itself is setting up for failure?

With over 312 million people and growing, the United States is rapidly running out of space. If environmentalists hope to maintain the remarkable environmental record of this country, they will need to make compromises. This is where the Obama Administration needs to step up, step in, and play the role of honest broker to all sides. Selectively picking environmental causes for political purposes only baffles environmentalists, enrages their opponents, and puts any reasonable chance for future discourse and compromise out of reach.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Where's Obama's Environmental Agenda?

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us