Skip to content
Sign up free
News

Who Pays for Party Conventions?

Who Pays for Party Conventions?

By Bianca Ciotti

2-minute read

(Andrew Harnik / The Washington Times)

Just who pays for party conventions? Taxpayers may be surprised to learn that at least in part, they do.

According to the Federal Election Committee, both the Republican and Democratic parties "received initial payments of $17,689,800 from the U.S. Treasury" to cover costs for their national conventions. Partisan and independent voters alike might be dismayed to learn about the growing  amount of taxpayer money being siphoned from federal taxes and granted to the Republican and Democratic parties even though they are private organizations.

Special interest groups are prohibited from financing conventions independently to prevent the growing influence that outside organizations hold over political parties. In the 1970s, the FEC first allotted each party two million dollars in order to balance the funds supplied by special interest groups. Since then, that amount was raised a number of times, and adjusted for inflation. Today, the FEC donates over eight times their original appropriation.

Taxpayers may be familiar with a check box located on the top of their federal tax returns, labeled "Donate X Amount to the Political Process." The funds donated by taxpayers who check this box are then used to pay for party conventions. Over $220 million has been spent by the federal government to fund conventions since 1976.

Federal funding for political conventions was an attempt to reduce the influence of outside special interests in the political process. However, special interest groups far exceed the amount of federal funding provided by nearly 3 dollars to every 1. The practice of providing federal funding for political conventions is an antiquated system that many, including a majority of US senators, believe should be abolished.

Earlier this year, the Senate voted in favor of an amendment which would abolish federal funding of party conventions. Supporters of the amendment hope that 2012 will be the last election year that taxpayers partially fund conventions. Both candidates have rejected federal funding for their campaigns, choosing instead to privately fund their election bids.

As the RNC continues this week, taxpayers will watch with a critical eye as Republicans lavishly announce their nomination. Did their hard earned money go towards paying for those balloons? Or perhaps the confetti? Taxpayers who donated funds to the "political process" on their tax forms should be sure to enjoy a glass of champagne and toast to the upcoming amendment, because there is a politico at the convention enjoying a glass that they bought.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Who Pays for Party Conventions?

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us