Skip to content
Sign up free
News

Why the Red Dawn Remake Denies the Reality of Today's Geopolitical World

Why the Red Dawn Remake Denies the Reality of Today's Geopolitical World

By Lucas Eaves

2-minute read

Tomorrow, the Red Dawn remake, the original movie dating from 1984 which describes the Soviet Union invading America and the resistance of group of teenagers, will be released in theaters in an attempt to capitalize on America's remaining Cold War-era fears.

The original Red Dawn was made in the middle of the 1980s, during the very real Cold War and, like Rocky IV or other movies of that period, symbolized a time where threats of another world war seemed real beginning with America's main enemy, the Soviet Union. The 2012 remake, which narrates a North Korean invasion of the United States, is void of any sense of reality -- which would not be that important if it did not deteriorate an already mediocre American general knowledge of foreign policy.

The long 2012 presidential campaign was punctuated by ignorant comments on foreign policy, which included that Russia remains America's arch enemy. The movie perpetuates similar disinformation by describing a surprise attack by North Korea with hundred of planes and thousands of soldiers. In reality, North Korea has been facing famine for the last decade, this year will be even worse and its army, while numerous, has been underfed and under equipped for years. The recent missile launch fiasco is an example of it. Meanwhile, polls shows that the North Korean threat remains very real in the American psyche and entertaining this fear does not serve any good.

The fact that the movie originally featured China as the invader, before the hopes of capitalizing on the Chinese market convinced the producers to change the flags in post production, further illustrates the gap between reality and fiction. But, as this story goes out in the media after the film's release, many viewers will likely substitute North Korea for China as the real enemy, therefore encouraging a misunderstanding of the American-Chinese relations. The election period has done its share of damage to popular trust in the United States major trade partner and banker, immortalizing China as a potential military threat to the United States will not help.

The common link between China and North Korea is that they are the last vestige of a communist threat, Cuba being negligible. In a time, when so many confusions and fears are projected on Obama's rampant "socialism," reviving the ghost of communism seems somehow inappropriate. I do not believe that today's complicated world relations, especially since 9/11 and the rise of trans-boundary terrorism, and the lack of clearly identifiable enemy should justify a return to the "less" complicated period of the Cold War, where the world could be painted in black and white.

The entertainment industry has shown its capacity to produce quality products that adequately paint today's elaborate geopolitical relations in shows like 24 or the recent Homeland. It is time to completely abandon in the cloakroom any pre-Berlin wall fall's ideas and stop blinding the American public from the complexity of the real world.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Why the Red Dawn Remake Denies the Reality of Today's Geopolitical World

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us