Skip to content
Subscribe

Will CA Taxpayers Pay For Coastal Commissioner Fines and Court Costs?

Will CA Taxpayers Pay For Coastal Commissioner Fines and Court Costs?
Published:

San Diego, CA.- IVN San Diego has obtained a letter dated September 26, 2016, from the CA Attorney General's office to John Ainsworth, the then acting Executive Director of the California Coastal Commission, discussing the legal representation the Attorney General's office provided for 5 coastal commissioners accused of violating open-government laws.

The letter, signed by Supervising Deputy Attorney General Jamee Patterson for then Attorney General Kamala Harris, brings up some questions now that a judgment has been entered against former commissioners Steven Kinsey, Martha McClure, and Wendy Mitchell and current commissioners Erik Howell and Mark Vargas.

Superior Court Ruling

On September 7, San Diego Superior Court Judge Timothy B. Taylor ordered the defendants to pay $929,046.57 in attorneys’ fees and $30,261.11 in court costs.  He had previously ruled that the defendants must pay fines in excess of $57,000.

According to Taylor’s ruling, the five defendants are “jointly and severally” liable for the attorneys’ fees. All defendants are likely on the hook for more than $959,300 in attorneys fees and court costs. The members are accused of violating a multitude of rules involving private communications with applicants who have projects before the commission.

Attorney General Letter 9/26/16

Who Will Pay The Fines?

The case is bringing to light the very real possibility taxpayers will foot the bill for the defendants’ pay-to-play scheme.

Noaki Schwartz is the Public Information Officer for the California Coastal Commission. IVN reached out to Schwartz to comment on the case. She issued the following statement:

"This lawsuit stems from lingering controversy that began during a previous period at the Commission. The law entitles the commissioners to representation by the State absent malice, fraud or corruption. This Commission earlier agreed to indemnify the defendants to the full extent provided by law. The Coastal Commission is looking forward to moving past this difficult chapter and is committed to the important mission of protecting the California coast."

I asked Schwartz to clarify what “earlier” meant.  She responded, "before the trial started."

There is no question the Attorney General's office provided legal representation to the defendants, and now it appears the Coastal Commission will be picking up the tab for their court costs and judgment in excess of $1 million.

Spotlight on Coastal Corruption

The plaintiff, nonprofit organization Spotlight on Coastal Corruption, sought about $22 million in fines with Martha McClure receiving an individual fine of $3.15 million.

According to Cory Briggs, the attorney representing Spotlight, each defendant is responsible for the full $959,307.68 in attorneys’ fees and court costs. “Each one of them is individually responsible for the full amount of attorney fees and costs. You can see the judge wrote for costs and attorneys’ fees, each of the defendants is ‘jointly and severally’ liable. It means collectively and individually you owe the money.”

Briggs told IVN San Diego, "It shocks the conscience that the defendants would expect taxpayers to pay for the damage done to the Commission’s reputation and to the public’s confidence in the regulators charged with protecting our precious coast.  How arrogant – and politically connected -- must you be to think that you can break the law and then have someone else pay the penalty?”

The Complaint

In its complaint, Spotlight accused the defendants of violating the Coastal Act, Public Resources Code Section 30324, by conducting ex parte communications without fully disclosing them and making them public within the time limits prescribed by law.

Spotlight also accused the defendants of violating Public Resources Code Section 30327 by using their official positions as commissioners to influence a commission decision about which they “knowingly had at least one ex parte communication that was not reported.”

Spotlight also alleged that McClure and Mitchell violated Public Resources Code section 30327.5 (b) by accepting illegal gifts.  In McClure’s case, this was a stay at the home of Don Schmitz, who represents clients, including U2 lead guitarist David Evans (the edge), with land development projects on the coast.

The case has been hard on McClure who had emergency surgery for an ulcer.  In an interview McClure noted of the court’s decision, “It will certainly jeopardize future people who want to sit on boards or any kind of state agency. It was almost two years into this horrible (lawsuit) and I can tell you right now I’m lying in a hospital in Honolulu from the ulcer that has been created by this, with emergency surgery. I’m getting out, but that’s the kind of ramifications this stuff has.”

Kathryn Burton, Spotlight’s president, said the organization was grateful for the court’s recognition of the “extraordinary public service” the group provided to the public in bringing attention and correction to the illegal practices of commissioners.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Will CA Taxpayers Pay For Coastal Commissioner Fines and Court Costs?

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us